A political firestorm has engulfed Washington after former FBI Director James Comey shared an Instagram post featuring a seemingly innocuous image of seashells — arranged to spell out the numbers “8647.” What appeared at first glance to be a whimsical beachside memento has instead sparked furious allegations of an assassination threat against President Donald Trump , prompted investigations by federal authorities, and reopened the festering wound of Trump vs. Comey — a bitter feud that has defined the darker undercurrents of American politics for nearly a decade.
The ‘8647’ Enigma
At the centre of the uproar is the interpretation of the numbers “86 47.” In American slang, “86” can mean to cancel, get rid of, or even “eliminate” someone. Meanwhile, “47” refers to Donald Trump’s current position as the 47th President of the United States. Combined, conservative critics allege, the numbers amount to a coded call for Trump’s assassination — an accusation that has escalated into a full-blown national security issue.
The post was quickly deleted after backlash erupted online. Donald Trump Jr. led the charge, posting: “Just James Comey casually calling for my dad to be murdered. This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!!!!” Right-wing commentators and lawmakers echoed the sentiment, framing the post as a veiled threat from a man who once headed the nation's top law enforcement agency.
Comey, for his part, denied any sinister intent. In a follow-up Instagram statement, he said: “I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn’t realise some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”
But in today’s hyper-polarised climate, the clarification did little to stem the outrage.
Federal Agencies Respond
The fallout from the post has extended well beyond social media. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem declared on X (formerly Twitter) that the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service were treating the matter as a potential threat against the President.
“Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of @POTUSTrump,” she wrote. “DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.”
The Secret Service, tasked with protecting the President, confirmed the initiation of an investigation. A spokesperson told CNN: “The Secret Service vigorously investigates anything that can be taken as a potential threat against our protectees. We take this responsibility very seriously.”
FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed coordination with the Secret Service, stating on X: “We are in communication with the Secret Service and Director (Sean) Curran. Primary jurisdiction is with SS on these matters and we, the FBI, will provide all necessary support.”
Adding fuel to the fire, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard went on Fox News and declared that Comey should be imprisoned. “I’m very concerned for [Trump’s] life,” she said. “And James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this.”
While Gabbard has no legal authority to press charges — and many legal experts remain sceptical of whether the post rises to the level of a criminal threat — the controversy has nonetheless become a dominant political issue.
A Violent Backdrop
The controversy is especially sensitive given its proximity to a near-fatal assassination attempt on Trump. On July 13, 2024, Trump was shot in the right ear while delivering a campaign speech in Butler, Pennsylvania. The shooter, reportedly a 19-year-old lone actor, was killed on site by a Secret Service sniper. One bystander died, and two others were injured.
The attempt on Trump’s life galvanised his supporters and shifted the tone of the 2024 presidential race. Then-President Joe Biden condemned the attack and called for unity, but the political temperature never truly cooled. In that context, any perceived threat to Trump — even in symbolic or numerical form — is viewed through an especially volatile lens.
Trump vs. Comey: The Long War
The ‘8647’ episode cannot be fully understood without unpacking the long and bitter feud between Trump and James Comey. Once seen as a buttoned-up, by-the-book bureaucrat, Comey was appointed FBI Director in 2013 by President Barack Obama . His tenure, however, placed him at the centre of two of the most politically charged investigations in modern US history.
First came the Clinton email probe. In July 2016, Comey held an extraordinary press conference announcing that the FBI would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while Secretary of State. While clearing her legally, he publicly criticised her actions as “extremely careless,” drawing bipartisan condemnation — Democrats accused him of damaging Clinton’s campaign; Republicans said he was letting her off easy.
Then came the Russia investigation. After Trump won the presidency in November 2016, the FBI began investigating potential links between Trump’s campaign and Russian efforts to interfere in the election. In May 2017, just months into his presidency, Trump abruptly fired Comey — an act that would later prompt the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller .
Trump justified the firing by calling Comey a “grandstander” and a “showboat,” and later admitted in an interview that the Russia investigation was a factor. That admission fueled allegations of obstruction of justice and sparked years of legal and political drama.
Comey, now unshackled from government service, went on a media blitz. His memoir, A Higher Loyalty, was a bestseller. He became a fixture on MSNBC, Twitter, and college campuses — positioning himself as a defender of the rule of law against Trump’s alleged abuses of power.
To Trump and his base, Comey became a symbol of the so-called “deep state” — an entrenched bureaucracy that, they argued, tried to delegitimise the Trump presidency through leaks, investigations, and partisan sabotage. To Comey’s defenders, he was a principled public servant caught in a political firestorm not of his own making.
The Political Fallout
As of now, no charges have been filed, and the investigation into Comey’s “8647” post remains ongoing. Legal analysts have cautioned that while the post may have been ill-advised or in poor taste, proving criminal intent — particularly incitement or threat — would require a high bar of evidence.
But the political damage may already be done. The incident has reignited debates over free speech, the power of symbolism, and the weaponisation of national security apparatus for partisan ends. For Trump’s supporters, it confirms suspicions that former officials still harbour ill will — and potentially worse. For Comey’s defenders, the backlash is seen as another overreach by a government veering toward authoritarian tendencies.
Whether “8647” was a cryptic message, a misunderstood reference, or simply an unfortunate coincidence, one thing is certain: the Trump-Comey saga is far from over. In today’s America, even seashells can start a storm.
The ‘8647’ Enigma
At the centre of the uproar is the interpretation of the numbers “86 47.” In American slang, “86” can mean to cancel, get rid of, or even “eliminate” someone. Meanwhile, “47” refers to Donald Trump’s current position as the 47th President of the United States. Combined, conservative critics allege, the numbers amount to a coded call for Trump’s assassination — an accusation that has escalated into a full-blown national security issue.
The post was quickly deleted after backlash erupted online. Donald Trump Jr. led the charge, posting: “Just James Comey casually calling for my dad to be murdered. This is who the Dem-Media worships. Demented!!!!” Right-wing commentators and lawmakers echoed the sentiment, framing the post as a veiled threat from a man who once headed the nation's top law enforcement agency.
Comey, for his part, denied any sinister intent. In a follow-up Instagram statement, he said: “I posted earlier a picture of some shells I saw today on a beach walk, which I assumed were a political message. I didn’t realise some folks associate those numbers with violence. It never occurred to me but I oppose violence of any kind so I took the post down.”
But in today’s hyper-polarised climate, the clarification did little to stem the outrage.
Federal Agencies Respond
The fallout from the post has extended well beyond social media. Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem declared on X (formerly Twitter) that the Department of Homeland Security and the Secret Service were treating the matter as a potential threat against the President.
“Disgraced former FBI Director James Comey just called for the assassination of @POTUSTrump,” she wrote. “DHS and Secret Service is investigating this threat and will respond appropriately.”
The Secret Service, tasked with protecting the President, confirmed the initiation of an investigation. A spokesperson told CNN: “The Secret Service vigorously investigates anything that can be taken as a potential threat against our protectees. We take this responsibility very seriously.”
FBI Director Kash Patel confirmed coordination with the Secret Service, stating on X: “We are in communication with the Secret Service and Director (Sean) Curran. Primary jurisdiction is with SS on these matters and we, the FBI, will provide all necessary support.”
Adding fuel to the fire, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard went on Fox News and declared that Comey should be imprisoned. “I’m very concerned for [Trump’s] life,” she said. “And James Comey, in my view, should be held accountable and put behind bars for this.”
While Gabbard has no legal authority to press charges — and many legal experts remain sceptical of whether the post rises to the level of a criminal threat — the controversy has nonetheless become a dominant political issue.
A Violent Backdrop
The controversy is especially sensitive given its proximity to a near-fatal assassination attempt on Trump. On July 13, 2024, Trump was shot in the right ear while delivering a campaign speech in Butler, Pennsylvania. The shooter, reportedly a 19-year-old lone actor, was killed on site by a Secret Service sniper. One bystander died, and two others were injured.
The attempt on Trump’s life galvanised his supporters and shifted the tone of the 2024 presidential race. Then-President Joe Biden condemned the attack and called for unity, but the political temperature never truly cooled. In that context, any perceived threat to Trump — even in symbolic or numerical form — is viewed through an especially volatile lens.
Trump vs. Comey: The Long War
The ‘8647’ episode cannot be fully understood without unpacking the long and bitter feud between Trump and James Comey. Once seen as a buttoned-up, by-the-book bureaucrat, Comey was appointed FBI Director in 2013 by President Barack Obama . His tenure, however, placed him at the centre of two of the most politically charged investigations in modern US history.
First came the Clinton email probe. In July 2016, Comey held an extraordinary press conference announcing that the FBI would not recommend charges against Hillary Clinton for her use of a private email server while Secretary of State. While clearing her legally, he publicly criticised her actions as “extremely careless,” drawing bipartisan condemnation — Democrats accused him of damaging Clinton’s campaign; Republicans said he was letting her off easy.
Then came the Russia investigation. After Trump won the presidency in November 2016, the FBI began investigating potential links between Trump’s campaign and Russian efforts to interfere in the election. In May 2017, just months into his presidency, Trump abruptly fired Comey — an act that would later prompt the appointment of Special Counsel Robert Mueller .
Trump justified the firing by calling Comey a “grandstander” and a “showboat,” and later admitted in an interview that the Russia investigation was a factor. That admission fueled allegations of obstruction of justice and sparked years of legal and political drama.
Comey, now unshackled from government service, went on a media blitz. His memoir, A Higher Loyalty, was a bestseller. He became a fixture on MSNBC, Twitter, and college campuses — positioning himself as a defender of the rule of law against Trump’s alleged abuses of power.
To Trump and his base, Comey became a symbol of the so-called “deep state” — an entrenched bureaucracy that, they argued, tried to delegitimise the Trump presidency through leaks, investigations, and partisan sabotage. To Comey’s defenders, he was a principled public servant caught in a political firestorm not of his own making.
The Political Fallout
As of now, no charges have been filed, and the investigation into Comey’s “8647” post remains ongoing. Legal analysts have cautioned that while the post may have been ill-advised or in poor taste, proving criminal intent — particularly incitement or threat — would require a high bar of evidence.
But the political damage may already be done. The incident has reignited debates over free speech, the power of symbolism, and the weaponisation of national security apparatus for partisan ends. For Trump’s supporters, it confirms suspicions that former officials still harbour ill will — and potentially worse. For Comey’s defenders, the backlash is seen as another overreach by a government veering toward authoritarian tendencies.
Whether “8647” was a cryptic message, a misunderstood reference, or simply an unfortunate coincidence, one thing is certain: the Trump-Comey saga is far from over. In today’s America, even seashells can start a storm.
You may also like
Ruben Amorim needs miracles to save Man Utd after another defeat against nervy Chelsea
Arne Slot tells Federico Chiesa what he has to do to fight his way into Liverpool plans
Oliver Glasner to ditch lucky omen for Crystal Palace's FA Cup Final vs Man City
Pep Guardiola fumes at the Premier League after Man City request rejected
Mikel Arteta responds to Kai Havertz's incredible transformation as Arsenal star bulks up
