Keep your chlorine chicken, America - Britain must not pay this price for a trade deal

As anticipation builds around today's unveiling of a UK-US trade deal, let us hope that the government’s optimism about “opportunity” and “growth” is exactly that.

As for those of us who’ve seen behind the curtain of American industry, the alarm bells are deafening. Because while the ink on the deal is still wet, one knows that Britain’s food standards - hard-won, respected and trusted - have long been in the crosshairs of .

We can all but hope that in the race to secure a post-Brexit, post-tariff trade deal, we have not made the sacrifices the US president insisted on during his first term in office. The worst would be chlorine-washed and hormone-injected beef on British shelves.

READ MORE:

READ MORE:

Let’s be clear. These are fears, not facts. But they are fears rooted in evidence, experience and statements from US producers who have made no secret of what they want in return for a deal: access to British markets for their cheaper, mass-produced meat.

In 2020, I travelled to Gainesville, Georgia - the self-styled poultry capital of the world - and gained entry into one of the mega-sheds that churn out chickens for the gluttonous American market. What I saw will stay with me forever: Tens of thousands of birds crammed into filthy, airless barns, unable to stretch a wing or take a step without walking on one another.

Covered in burns and sores, these animals spend their pitiful seven weeks in near-total darkness before being herded to the slaughterhouse. I held one in my hand. Less than eight weeks old. Its heart raced with panic.

I was told that, due to aggressive rearing, it had grown so fast that if it were a human toddler, it would weigh over 47 stone. The end comes quickly: their throats are slit by machines, feathers plucked, then the carcasses are washed in chlorine to kill the bacteria allowed to thrive in these horrific conditions. This is not hygiene - it’s damage control.

For 28 years, such chicken has been banned in the EU - not because the chlorine itself is toxic, but because the process hides the filth and animal abuse behind a chemical rinse. That ban still stands in the UK… for now.

But chicken isn’t the only worry. There is just as much concern about US beef, much of which comes from cattle treated with growth hormones banned in the UK and Europe for decades. Again, I gained access to these mega ranches where cows stand in brown, dust-filled pens with not a blade of grass in sight.

The hormones are used to bulk up cows faster and cheaper, allowing producers to squeeze more meat from every animal. But this practice is illegal here, not just on animal welfare grounds, but because of long-standing health concerns.

Back then, US negotiators wanted Britain to abandon its red lines. British farmers are watching today with growing anxiety. They’ve invested in higher welfare standards, traceability, and food safety. They know they cannot - and should not - be forced to compete with a system that treats animals as meat machines and consumers as passive recipients of whatever’s cheapest.

This isn’t anti-Americanism. It’s pro-standards. Pro-transparency. Pro-public health. Britain has long prided itself on world-class farming. Post-Brexit, we were told this was a chance to raise our standards even further. Instead, the fear is that we’ll be strong-armed into a deal that lowers them behind our backs.

No one is saying this future is guaranteed. But it is possible - and that alone should worry us. Because once it’s in our shops, it’s too late. Once British farmers are undercut, there’s no going back. And once public trust in food safety starts to erode, it’s nearly impossible to rebuild.

We can but hope that today’s deal with the US is done on British terms. We must not have let food become a bargaining chip. The British public deserves better. And so do our farmers.